The integration of AI into architecture over the next ten years is expected to be profound. While this statement may not sound groundbreaking at first, let’s pause for a moment. How often do you, as an architect, reflect on the potential changes our field will undergo in the next decade?
Personally, I don’t spend a lot of time thinking about it. Sure, I sometimes daydream about futuristic tools that could make my life easier, but it’s not something on my daily agenda. Yet, time will pass, and soon we’ll find ourselves facing new realities, quite different from what we know today.
Yes, we’re seeing AI being used in architecture, but let’s be honest: it hasn’t revolutionized our workflows just yet. Compared to fields like content creation, where AI is already having a profound impact, architecture is still on the cusp of experiencing these shifts.
I once read that to succeed in business, you should anticipate how people will work in a decade and bring that technology or process to the present. Easier said than done, right? But let’s try to think ahead together.
Today, we have AI tools that offer generative solutions—creating images or generating building volume variations based on given constraints. That’s great, but I believe the real game-changer will be when AI can provide live data from every corner of the world, for any city or district. Imagine AI that understands the specific challenges of a location, suggests solutions, generates building volumes based on needs, and offers accurate predictions of the impact of planned developments.
While many AI tools currently perform some aspects of these tasks, I’m talking about a unified system that shares data globally with all stakeholders. Such a system could transform how we plan and design cities and communities on a large scale.
But what about smaller projects, like designing a family house? You might not need vast amounts of AI data—topography and manual site analysis often suffice. However, envision a tool that not only generates detailed drawings but also connects you with nearby building material suppliers, complete with updated pricing. Imagine being able to compare multiple offers and choose the best one, and if you decide to change a particular exterior material based on availability or cost, the tool would automatically update the design and drawings. That would be a game-changer.
And what about one of the biggest pain points for architects: the building permit process? Could this be streamlined by AI? Imagine how much faster we could obtain permits if an AI system handled it. The process could become almost instantaneous. Picture a design tool that’s connected to the building permit system, guiding you through regulations as you work, so by the time your design is complete, the permit is automatically issued.
Of course, there’s even greater potential for AI integration in architecture. But while I’m excited about these possibilities, I believe certain aspects of architecture—like design creativity and concept generation—should remain in human hands. The best part of our profession is coming up with ideas and bringing them to life, and I would reserve that role for us. Meanwhile, the repetitive, tedious tasks, such as navigating building codes and regulations, could be left to AI.
What do you think? Which parts of the building design process would you delegate to AI?
Leave a Reply